London 1895. Based on Oscar Wilde's play "An Ideal Husband", this 1999
adaptation is a charming comedy of manners about a member of the British
parliament, Robert Chiltern (Jeremy Northam), whose perfect life is threatened
by a Ms. Cheveley (Julianne Moore) when she informs him that she has a certain
piece of physical evidence (a letter) proving that he came into his early
fortune by selling a cabinet secret to her former lover. She plans on
going public with the letter unless...he alters his stance on a
fraudulent scheme to build a canal in Argentina. She's invested in the
scheme and will make a ton of dough if the British government supports it.
Chiltern's wife (Cate Blanchett) has no idea about her husband's past illegal
activity and believes that he is "an ideal husband".
Typing it out like that, it kinda seems like a serious story and I guess it is
when you think about how Chiltern's entire career and vast fortune is
based on an illegal act that should have landed him in prison, but...that's
overthinking the story. And besides, as Chiltern says "Is it fair, Arthur, that some act of youthful folly should be brought up
against me now all of these years later?" I mean, c'mon! All he did was make a ton of money by selling
government secrets! Jeez. Who doesn't have "youthful folly" like
that in their past?
Anyway, I'm looking way too deep into the story because the reason to watch the
film is not seeing Chiltern's cows coming home to roost, but to see
Rupert Everett's show-stealing performance as Chiltern's best friend and eternal
bachelor Lord Arthur Goring! Compared to Goring's witty manner and playful
dialogue, the Chiltern storyline is a bore. There's a reason that
Everett's handsome mug is on all of the posters. It's because he's far and
away the best part of the movie. I've seen AN IDEAL HUSBAND many times
over the years (including three times in the theater) and it's always Everett's
fantastic performance that brings me back.
Beautiful London locations (both inside and outside), delightful dialogue that
is a joy to listen to, great performances by a strong cast, quick pace and a
surprise appearance by Doug "Pinhead" Bradley. Despite the negative
feelings I have towards Chiltern's "youthful folly" I still like this movie and
watch it once or twice a year. Recommended.
Showing posts with label Rupert Everett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rupert Everett. Show all posts
Friday, May 27, 2016
Sunday, February 2, 2014
CEMETERY MAN (1994)
Cemetery caretaker Francesco Dellamorte (Rupert Everett) has a problem. In
the daytime, his job is pretty peaceful: burying dead people, tending to the
grounds, talking to his intellectually disabled assistant Gnaghi, but at night
things get kinda hairy thanks to the bizarre phenomenon of people coming back to
life one week after their death. Dellamorte isn't too thrilled with the
situation, but it's the only job he can get (plus he lives on the grounds), so
he just deals with it. His peaceful (minus the zombie killing) life is
turned upside-down one day when a beautiful woman comes to bury her elderly
husband. Dellamorte instantly notices that she is extremely beautiful and
has one of the greatest bodies on the planet so he sets out to woo her.
Things don't go too well and they get even worse when there's a sudden influx of
corpses getting buried...also, there's the business of the Angel of Death
himself visiting Dellamorte.
When I first saw this in the theater back in the mid-90's, I was quite taken with it, but revisiting it now it didn't hold up as well as I had remembered. The story drags on a little bit, there's not enough zombie action, the special effects are only so-so and that vague ending is disappointing That said, I did enjoy the slight surrealist elements, the scenery, Everett's performance, the original story, Anna Falchi's boner exploding nude scenes and the top-notch photography.
The average horror fan will probably be disappointed that it's not a complete zombie bloodbath, but those that like something a little different will get a kick out of it. Worth watching at least once.
When I first saw this in the theater back in the mid-90's, I was quite taken with it, but revisiting it now it didn't hold up as well as I had remembered. The story drags on a little bit, there's not enough zombie action, the special effects are only so-so and that vague ending is disappointing That said, I did enjoy the slight surrealist elements, the scenery, Everett's performance, the original story, Anna Falchi's boner exploding nude scenes and the top-notch photography.
The average horror fan will probably be disappointed that it's not a complete zombie bloodbath, but those that like something a little different will get a kick out of it. Worth watching at least once.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)