After a year in prison, three Confederate soldiers (Barry Sullivan, James
Whitmore and Joel McCrea) escape. It doesn't take too long for them to get
captured, but it's not by the Yankees but some former Confederate soldiers that
have now turned bandits. Bloodthirsty and out to kill just for the sake of
killing, the bandits persuade McCrea and company into a plan to get employed by
a Yankee wagon train out of Santa Fe and lead it 800 miles east into a
trap. Along the way, McCrea begins to fall for the lone female on the trip
(Arlene Dahl) and starts to have second thoughts. Finally, right as
they're about to be lead into the slaughter McCrea confesses the truth, but by
now it's too late. Brilliant.
THE OUTRIDERS is too average for it's own good. The action, the acting,
the direction, the photography...all of it is just "Meh." The story was
especially predictable. I wanted to like the film, but within 20 minutes I
was already daydreaming. Only worth a watch for hardcore Western fans.
Saturday, August 2, 2014
Friday, August 1, 2014
CRUISING (1980)
There's a rash of brutal killings going on in the leather/S&M segment of the
NYC gay community. At the same time there's unidentified male body parts
washing up on the Hudson River. Could it all be linked to the same
killer? There's only one way to find out: throw cop Al Pacino deep
undercover in the leather bar scene and see what happens. Did he get any
kind of specialized training? How about a psychological evaluation
first? Exactly how deep undercover is he? Can he do drugs?
Have gay sex? What exactly is going on? Who knows, cause none of
that is ever explained. The film opens with some crime stuff, then Al
getting asked if he wants to go undercover, he agrees and BOOM! he's undercover
in a gay bar looking like a fish out of water while some dude is getting fisted
off to the side.
Despite the purposeful(?) ambiguity, I really enjoyed the first 50 minutes or so, but then when it got more centered in on the crime solving and less on the gay bars I began to lose interest. Also, the vagueness of the killer was bothersome. Did the same actor play the killer in all of the killer scenes? I know for a fact that wasn't his real voice. And what was up with that weak ending? For starting off so vigorously, CRUISING busts it's thick, hot, yummy, sticky load way too soon.
I did really like the scene where Al was dancing and huffing on that rag. Every time he hit it the colors brightened and his dancing got more animated. Good stuff. In summery, CRUISING is a good film, but it could have really benefited from a more straight-forward story, a more memorable killer, more brutality and much more sweaty gay sex. A better explanation of the leather scene would have helped also. Still, it's very much worth watching. Keep an sharp eye out for all of the young actors that would later go on to big careers.
Despite the purposeful(?) ambiguity, I really enjoyed the first 50 minutes or so, but then when it got more centered in on the crime solving and less on the gay bars I began to lose interest. Also, the vagueness of the killer was bothersome. Did the same actor play the killer in all of the killer scenes? I know for a fact that wasn't his real voice. And what was up with that weak ending? For starting off so vigorously, CRUISING busts it's thick, hot, yummy, sticky load way too soon.
I did really like the scene where Al was dancing and huffing on that rag. Every time he hit it the colors brightened and his dancing got more animated. Good stuff. In summery, CRUISING is a good film, but it could have really benefited from a more straight-forward story, a more memorable killer, more brutality and much more sweaty gay sex. A better explanation of the leather scene would have helped also. Still, it's very much worth watching. Keep an sharp eye out for all of the young actors that would later go on to big careers.
Labels:
1980's,
Al Pacino,
gay,
James Remar
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)