What a bizarre movie. Instead of doing the logical thing and following up THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE with a cash-in sequel (who knows, maybe there was an legal issue) TCM director/producer/writer/composer Tobe Hooper, writer Kim Henkel and main actress Marilyn Burns created this almost fever dream-like story of an old coot (Neville Brand) running a hotel near a swamp. Despite the fact that the hotel is completely dilapidated, there's no road nearby and the owner is clearly insane the place still gets a steady stream of customers...whom, the owner, kills about as quickly as they show up and then feeds to his huge crocodile. It makes no sense at all.
Still, there's something about EATEN ALIVE that you can't take your eyes off of it. It's just so strange that it's more fascinating than it is entertaining. Over-the-top acting by an whole cast of weird characters, sudden unexpected spurts of violence, gritty camerawork that reminded me at moments of TCM, eternal nighttime, two surprisingly nice topless scenes, strange set design, fake as hell looking crocodile, Marilyn Burns underused (she should have had a bigger role), lots of fog (at one point - 1:19:53 - I swear Neville does the Leatherface dance, but there's so much fog it's hard to tell), old timey country music playing almost non-stop, surreal colours, Freddy Krueger topless.
Not horrible, but not good either. Just strange.
Saturday, October 11, 2014
Thursday, October 2, 2014
DOGVILLE (2003)
Like some kind of Biblical fable about a secret angel showing it's weakness to a
group of humans in order to judge their compassion DOGVILLE is the story of a
frail woman, Grace (Nicole Kidman), who wanders into the small "town" of
Dogville in need of help. I say town in quotes because its only got
like 15 people living there, all on one street. Anyway, Grace is penniless
and looking for shelter. The townsfolk, somewhat reluctantly, take her in
and even after it's discovered that she's wanted by the Law they keep hiding
her. To earn her keep she does odd jobs for citizens of Dogville.
Then things start to take a more sinister turn.
Before you take it upon yourself to watch DOGVILLE you're first going to need to gird your loins. The runtime is nearly 3 hours and that's just ridiculous because this story could have easily been told in less than two. Next (and this is the biggest thing) is there isn't an actual town or sky or trees or anything. The entire movie is filmed on a single "black box theater"-style stage with the imaginary street and houses and plants and everything drawn out on the floor. Outside of a few minor set pieces (a desk, an organ, a bed, etc.) the entire film is in your head. That's an interesting experiment, but it gets old quickly and just comes off looking cheap and pretentious. Next is the camerawork that seems, by the way it's always teetering around and never standing still, to be taken by somebody wearing Google Glass. After that is the editing which is just all over the place. I don't even have any idea what was going on there...was it taken from multiple takes with absolutely no consideration for continuity or flow? One moment a person will be laying down (cut to the next angle) and literally 0.0001 of a second later they're sitting up. It happened so flagrantly that it had to been on purpose. The acting by the impressive cast was good for the most part, but there were a few that seemed not up to their normal standards, so I'm guessing once again: the stiff acting was done intentionally for some kind of artistic reason?
I didn't dislike DOGVILLE. I'm all for filmmakers taking chances and trying something new, but a lot of the stuff that went on here went right over my stupid little head. I did take issue with the excessive run time. I liked the story (even though I didn't really understand what the point of the whole thing was), but it was just too long-winded and the characters too unbelievable. That last act took forever and how dumb could that main guy be?!
Interesting watch for the braver film lover, but I think most people will be totally unamused.
Before you take it upon yourself to watch DOGVILLE you're first going to need to gird your loins. The runtime is nearly 3 hours and that's just ridiculous because this story could have easily been told in less than two. Next (and this is the biggest thing) is there isn't an actual town or sky or trees or anything. The entire movie is filmed on a single "black box theater"-style stage with the imaginary street and houses and plants and everything drawn out on the floor. Outside of a few minor set pieces (a desk, an organ, a bed, etc.) the entire film is in your head. That's an interesting experiment, but it gets old quickly and just comes off looking cheap and pretentious. Next is the camerawork that seems, by the way it's always teetering around and never standing still, to be taken by somebody wearing Google Glass. After that is the editing which is just all over the place. I don't even have any idea what was going on there...was it taken from multiple takes with absolutely no consideration for continuity or flow? One moment a person will be laying down (cut to the next angle) and literally 0.0001 of a second later they're sitting up. It happened so flagrantly that it had to been on purpose. The acting by the impressive cast was good for the most part, but there were a few that seemed not up to their normal standards, so I'm guessing once again: the stiff acting was done intentionally for some kind of artistic reason?
I didn't dislike DOGVILLE. I'm all for filmmakers taking chances and trying something new, but a lot of the stuff that went on here went right over my stupid little head. I did take issue with the excessive run time. I liked the story (even though I didn't really understand what the point of the whole thing was), but it was just too long-winded and the characters too unbelievable. That last act took forever and how dumb could that main guy be?!
Interesting watch for the braver film lover, but I think most people will be totally unamused.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)