I must have missed something. I've seen this film three times now over the
course of a few decades and each time it goes right over my head.
Hollywood-ized "punk" Emilio Estevez gets fired from his grocery store job and
eventually falls in with a car repossession company. Some minor adventures
happen (repossessing cars, getting shot at, getting maced, convenience store
shoot-out, banging a cute chick in the backseat of a car, vomiting, etc.), but
the main story line is about a
1964 Chevy Malibu with a $20,000 reward on
it. Every two-bit repo man in LA is looking for it! What the hell
could be so special about it that it has such a high bounty?
And that's about it. Is there some kind of satire or social/political
statement that I'm missing? Who knows. As it is though, the
authentic LA street scenery was the most interesting thing going on. The
story is so-so, but it doesn't go anywhere. The acting is good. I
especially liked Harry Dean Stanton. The "punk" aspect is barely even
touched out other than a few people having mohawks and couple of punk songs
playing in the background. Other than that, REPO MAN is kind of a
bore. Zero nudity, bland dialogue, unsatisfying ending, low budget
distractions, hit or miss pacing, no violence.
I don't dislike REPO MAN, it's just not my bag. I did notice a few things
that were influential in later films, video games, etc., so for that, at least,
it's kinda cool.