New fireman William Baldwin (oh god...I'm already bored) lives in some big
shadows. His father was a legendary firefighter who died in a fire that
ended up on the cover of Life Magazine and his older brother (Kurt Russell) is
the toughest, manliest firefighter since John Wayne clubbed an oil well fire to
death with his penis in
HELLFIGHTERS. Even worse...he's been stationed to the same firehouse as his brother.
All kinds of predictable brotherly competition and firefighting ruggedness
happens next. There's even a musical montage!
BACKDRAFT is mildly entertaining and actually more fun to laugh at than it is to
take serious, but then something interesting happens and we're introduced to a
mystery arsonist who's killing people using a technique called
"backdraft". It seems that the fire is somehow held inside a room
magically and then when the victim opens the doors the fire backdrafts all up in
their shit and punches them like 50 feet through the air. It also makes a
howling noise like a dragon having sex with an iceberg. Fire investigator
Robert De Niro is sent in to investigate the murders...and that's the best part
of the movie. While De Niro was onscreen, rambling about how fire is an
actual living thing I was totally into it. It was silly as fook,
but still compelling. His scenes with firebug Donald Sutherland were the
highlight of the film. Unfortunately though, these scenes only make up a
small portion of the film.
Overall, BACKDRAFT is very dated, the story is in dire need of a re-write, the
special effects are alright, the firefighting scenes are unbelievable, the
entire thing looks like a movie, the acting by the impressive cast (not
Baldwin) was above average (...I especially liked Sutherland. He was doing
some serious Hannibal Lecter from
THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS
channeling).
Not the greatest thing I've even seen, but it was an interesting ride and a fun
look back at early 90's big studio action/dramas. We also get to see the
guy from IRON EAGLE's pubes!!!
Update: Just watched the 2006 DVD release of the film and I noticed that the
dude from IRON EAGLE's pubes are now missing! Weird, huh?
Part 2 - Backdraft II (2019)
Showing posts with label Robert De Niro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert De Niro. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 9, 2015
Friday, May 16, 2014
THE UNTOUCHABLES (1987)
In 1930, Al Capone (Robert De Niro) was one of the most powerful gangsters in
America. Most of his power, wealth and influence came from the US
government's brilliant decision to make booze illegal. Thanks to
Prohibition, organized crime syndicates got a massive boost. It's
estimated that, during the Prohibition, the illegal alcohol beverage industry
averaged
$3 billion per year
in illegal untaxed income! Rather than just repealing Prohibition, the
government sends in Prohibition agent Kevin Costner to take down Capone.
Costner quickly learns that Capone has the police in his back pocket, so he
assembles a tight-knit group of agents that a willing to risk everything to stop
Capone illegal shenanigans. He calls them...Hero Squad, I mean, The
Untouchables.
That sounds exciting...a government-backed special agent versus a ruthless gangster who has more money than god. If it was told in a cynical, dark and extremely violent way it would be awesome! Instead Brian De Palma's THE UNTOUCHABLES just isn't very good. The acting is laughable (1987 must have been an absolute crap year for movies for Sean Connery to actually win an Academy Award for his totally average performance. Then again the award probably should have just gone to R. Lee Ermey for FULL METAL JACKET), the music (while by itself is fine) is sometimes jarringly out of place in this film (example: the happy sounding music during the horse riding scene...the nerdy accountant gleefully yelling "Woooooo!!!" didn't help things either), the story is telegraphed way in advance and has zero tension...and the direction! Ohh brother. I've never been an admirer of De Palma and this film does nothing to change that. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the entire way this movie looked just irritated me. It looked like a movie. Staged and unnatural.
Also for a movie being about Al Capone there's very little Al Capone in the film. I think he had like 6 - 7 scenes total and none of them were very long. Skip it. If you need me I'll be in my room watching "Boardwalk Empire".
That sounds exciting...a government-backed special agent versus a ruthless gangster who has more money than god. If it was told in a cynical, dark and extremely violent way it would be awesome! Instead Brian De Palma's THE UNTOUCHABLES just isn't very good. The acting is laughable (1987 must have been an absolute crap year for movies for Sean Connery to actually win an Academy Award for his totally average performance. Then again the award probably should have just gone to R. Lee Ermey for FULL METAL JACKET), the music (while by itself is fine) is sometimes jarringly out of place in this film (example: the happy sounding music during the horse riding scene...the nerdy accountant gleefully yelling "Woooooo!!!" didn't help things either), the story is telegraphed way in advance and has zero tension...and the direction! Ohh brother. I've never been an admirer of De Palma and this film does nothing to change that. I can't quite put my finger on it, but the entire way this movie looked just irritated me. It looked like a movie. Staged and unnatural.
Also for a movie being about Al Capone there's very little Al Capone in the film. I think he had like 6 - 7 scenes total and none of them were very long. Skip it. If you need me I'll be in my room watching "Boardwalk Empire".
The guy in the middle of the screen looks like he twisted his ankle.
"Yearbook"? Don't you mean "textbook"?
After the hand grenade lands for the second(!)
time the explosion comes from out of the ground beside it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)