John Wesley Hardin (Rock Hudson) is released from prison and on his way out of
town he drops off his handwritten autobiography at the local newspaper office.
Flashback time.
Hardin was raised by a Jesus lover who was a big believer in Proverbs 13:24 (a
Bible verse that encourages parents to beat the shit out of their children...for
their own good, of course). The ass whoopins didn't help much because when John
is still a teenager he has some trouble during a card game and kills a man. The
police aren't going to believe it's self-defense (and the man has three
ill-tempered brothers), so Hardin goes on the lam. But it seems trouble has a
way of always finding Hardin and Hardin does his part to always keep the
gravediggers in business. After a few years of this, Hardin finally settles down
with his main squeeze and they start a farm. Things are going good and she even
has a little baby on the way...but the past isn't done with Hardin just yet.
For an older western, THE LAWLESS BREED is entertaining. Rock Hudson
definitely has a commanding screen presence and the pace is quick. But then
after seeing the movie I did a little reading about the real John Wesley Hardin
and holy horse pussy that guy (at least according to
his Wikipedia page) was a fucking maniac! It's like everywhere he went he killed somebody. He
even shot some guy through the wall of a hotel room because he was snoring too
loud!!! Attention Hollywood: instead of making movies about talking Chihuahuas
or a weredolphin winning a breakdancing contest to help cure childhood
terminal butt cancer
or whatever it is you make movies about...how about a hardcore NC-17 movie about
the legend of John Wesley Hardin? This dude was something else. On top of
killing nearly everybody on the planet, he studied law in prison then when he
got out passed the Bar Exam, married a 15 year-old girl and then "accidentally"
killed a guy during a bet before finally being gunned down while playing dice in
a saloon.
Back to THE LAWLESS BREED. Good film, but nothing life changing.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
THE INCITE MILL (2010)
Ten strangers agree to stay in a remote underground complex for 7 days in exchange for a big payday. Naturally it doesn't take a genius to realize this sounds too good to be true. The participants are quickly manipulated into not trusting each other and then in their private rooms each is given a secret weapon. Secret alliances form and soon the blood begins to spill...unfortunately for the viewer the blood I speak of could barely fill coffee cup. I'm assuming that THE INCITE MILL is just another version of Agatha Christie's mystery novel "And Then There Were None" and as mysteries go TIM fails yet again. There's pretty much zero doubt as to the winner would be.
Overall, I enjoyed watching Tatsuya Fujiwara since it brought back memories of DEATH NOTE and Haruka Ayase brought back memories of CYBORG GIRL, but other than that I was pretty disappointed by the entire movie. It felt kinda cheap, the violence is on level with a network television crime drama, zero nudity, the tension was nonexistent and the story was promising (although the reason they all got together was just lazy and silly), but ultimately unsatisfying. Not a terrible film, but not worth watching either.
Overall, I enjoyed watching Tatsuya Fujiwara since it brought back memories of DEATH NOTE and Haruka Ayase brought back memories of CYBORG GIRL, but other than that I was pretty disappointed by the entire movie. It felt kinda cheap, the violence is on level with a network television crime drama, zero nudity, the tension was nonexistent and the story was promising (although the reason they all got together was just lazy and silly), but ultimately unsatisfying. Not a terrible film, but not worth watching either.
Friday, February 24, 2012
THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO (2009)
[Update 07/27/2021: Need to redo this review completely. Fix the screenshots
also.]
Compared to the novel, the film is a huge disappointment. A few weeks ago I devoured these books one after another and when I finished the third book I just sat there motionless for a long time daydreaming, in my sadness, about all the different ways the story could have continued. I'm sure my dreams pale in comparison to the story that Steig Larsson had planned, but since he died before book 4 was completed, my daydreams are all I'll ever have.
My next fix of the Lisbeth Salander/Mikael Blomkvist world was this Swedish movie adaptation. I was really excited about watching it, in anticipation of it being awesome and me buying the Blu-Rays and reliving the story over and over and over...well, that's never going to happen because after trudging through this lifeless clunker I never want to see it again.
If you've never read the novel that might sound brutal, since this film might actually be satisfying to the easily amused, but to me, as a fan of the book, there was a lot wrong with this film. For the sake of not sitting here writing a long ass review I'll just mention a few points that bothered me:
1) the complete removal of the relationship between Erika Berger and Mikael. This is just insane because their relationship is one of the key points of the entire series! And the reason for the cliffhanger ending of the book which...
2) wasn't even included in the movie!!! Not that it matters much because...
3) the immensely complex relationship between Lisbeth and Mikael has been weakened and watered down so much that it doesn't seem much more that just a sexual fling.
4) the massive trimming down of the"Millennium" storyline, including the relationship with the Vanger family.
5) Henrik Vanger's luring Mikael with information about Hans-Erik Wennerström.
6) less characters in the Harriet Vanger mystery.
7) how Martin's car trip ends, not to mention the line Lisbeth gave Martin when she entered his basement.
8) Lisbeth didn't try and hide her computer secret. Also, her introduction to the Harriet investigation was silly in this version and goes totally against her book character.
9) the almost complete removal of Dragan Armansky.
10) the entire Lisbeth character. I don't even want to get into it.
Bottom line: if I had seen the movie version first I would've never read the novel. Even at 152 minutes, it's too streamlined and the entire feel is just wrong. I didn't like it and I wish I had never seen it since it tarnishes the vision/feelings that I created in my head while reading the book. My advise? Buy the book and forget this movie even exists...I'm damn sure going to.
Part 2 - The Girl Who Played with Fire (2009)
Part 3 - The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest (2009)
Remake Part 1 - The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011)
Remake Part 2 - The Girl in the Spider's Web (2018)
Compared to the novel, the film is a huge disappointment. A few weeks ago I devoured these books one after another and when I finished the third book I just sat there motionless for a long time daydreaming, in my sadness, about all the different ways the story could have continued. I'm sure my dreams pale in comparison to the story that Steig Larsson had planned, but since he died before book 4 was completed, my daydreams are all I'll ever have.
My next fix of the Lisbeth Salander/Mikael Blomkvist world was this Swedish movie adaptation. I was really excited about watching it, in anticipation of it being awesome and me buying the Blu-Rays and reliving the story over and over and over...well, that's never going to happen because after trudging through this lifeless clunker I never want to see it again.
If you've never read the novel that might sound brutal, since this film might actually be satisfying to the easily amused, but to me, as a fan of the book, there was a lot wrong with this film. For the sake of not sitting here writing a long ass review I'll just mention a few points that bothered me:
1) the complete removal of the relationship between Erika Berger and Mikael. This is just insane because their relationship is one of the key points of the entire series! And the reason for the cliffhanger ending of the book which...
2) wasn't even included in the movie!!! Not that it matters much because...
3) the immensely complex relationship between Lisbeth and Mikael has been weakened and watered down so much that it doesn't seem much more that just a sexual fling.
4) the massive trimming down of the"Millennium" storyline, including the relationship with the Vanger family.
5) Henrik Vanger's luring Mikael with information about Hans-Erik Wennerström.
6) less characters in the Harriet Vanger mystery.
7) how Martin's car trip ends, not to mention the line Lisbeth gave Martin when she entered his basement.
8) Lisbeth didn't try and hide her computer secret. Also, her introduction to the Harriet investigation was silly in this version and goes totally against her book character.
9) the almost complete removal of Dragan Armansky.
10) the entire Lisbeth character. I don't even want to get into it.
Bottom line: if I had seen the movie version first I would've never read the novel. Even at 152 minutes, it's too streamlined and the entire feel is just wrong. I didn't like it and I wish I had never seen it since it tarnishes the vision/feelings that I created in my head while reading the book. My advise? Buy the book and forget this movie even exists...I'm damn sure going to.
Part 2 - The Girl Who Played with Fire (2009)
Part 3 - The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest (2009)
Remake Part 1 - The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011)
Remake Part 2 - The Girl in the Spider's Web (2018)
Monday, February 20, 2012
THAT EVENING SUN (2009)
Legendary actor Hal Holbrook plays Abner Meecham, an old man who, after a fall was placed in an assisted living home by his son. Abner doesn't like it there, so one day he says "Deuces!" and walks out. He catches a ride back to his farm only to find that his son has rented his homestead out to a white trash family headed up by Lonzo Choat. Unwilling to give up the home he's worked his entire life for, he moves into a small shack off to the side of the big house and refuses to leave. What follows next is an increasingly volatile standoff between Meecham and Choat.
So close to being awesome. The first two acts of the story were really good. Excellent character development, lots of tension building, but then it seems the writer wrote himself into a corner because the ending, at least to me, was a major letdown. I was hoping for something explosive and memorable. Instead THAT EVENING SUN drops with a thud.
Worth a watch for sure, if only for Hal Holbrook's performance. I'm kinda surprised that he didn't receive an Oscar nomination for his performance, but then again the Academy has never been known for making smart decisions. The entire supporting cast was very good also.
So close to being awesome. The first two acts of the story were really good. Excellent character development, lots of tension building, but then it seems the writer wrote himself into a corner because the ending, at least to me, was a major letdown. I was hoping for something explosive and memorable. Instead THAT EVENING SUN drops with a thud.
Worth a watch for sure, if only for Hal Holbrook's performance. I'm kinda surprised that he didn't receive an Oscar nomination for his performance, but then again the Academy has never been known for making smart decisions. The entire supporting cast was very good also.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)