"You talking to me?"
Vietnam vet Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro) suffers from insomnia and, most
likely, some sort of mental disorder. As the film begins he lands a job as
a taxi driver in NYC. The long overnight hours don't help his fragile
brain and he soon begins to lose his already faint grasp on
reality. By some stroke of luck, he lands a date with the attractive Betsy
(Cybill Shepherd) who is a campaign worker for a presidential candidate.
The date goes about as disastrous as you would expect. This pushes Travis
closer to the edge and the last thing in the world Travis needs right now is to
buy some guns and become obsessed with an underage neighborhood prostitute.
TAXI DRIVER is still, even all of these years later, a powerful film and a
fascinating look into a man that has a whole host of mental issues. The
film never gets to the root of his problems (it would've been great if we knew
more about his childhood or his stint in the military) and at times the film is
so dream-like that the viewer doesn't even know if what's on the screen is real
or not! Travis is also a walking ball of contradictions...he writes in his
diary about being healthy but yet he's constantly popping pills and eating crap
food; he speaks of purity but spends his free time in porno theaters; he whines
about his crushing loneliness but yet when he's around his co-workers all he
does is stare in silence...it's like he's subconsciously contributing to his
problems. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
You often see TAXI DRIVER on lists of Greatest Films and while I do like it and
definitely have a lot of respect for it, I'm not putting it on my Best
Films list. That'll probably upset some people, but since this is my own
personal blog then I can do whatever I want. For example: here's a link to
THE ABOMINATION. Why? Cuz the movie's awesome. My reasons though, if anybody
does care, are: the story is not violent enough; there's way too many
pedestrians staring at the camera; the entire dancing scene should have been
left out (it's boring and I think it detracts from the fact that nearly the
entire film is from Travis' view); the horrible desaturation of the colours in
shootout scene (yes, I understand this was to appease the pussies at the MPAA,
but it's still a perversion of Scorsese's vision and it's lessens the
impact of that jaw-dropping scene) and I think the film should have ended right
as that unbelievably amazing overhead tracking shot leaves Iris' bedroom.
That exact moment was the emotional height of the film and the remaining
few minutes only detracted from the film. Disagree? Think I'm an
idiot? Then quit reading my shit. Go away. I look at it like
the freeze-frame at the end of
ROCKY. That exact moment was the pinnacle of Rocky's life so it made
for the perfect ending. Travis Bickle, on the other hand, his goal was to
be the rain that would "wash all this scum off the streets" as he says at
the beginning of the film. This moment was his wildest suicidal fantasy
come to life. To go out in a blaze of glory while killing some of the
"degenerates" that are destroying the world...
"Listen, you fuckers, you screwheads. Here is a man who would not take it
anymore. A man who stood up against the scum, the cunts, the dogs, the filth,
the shit. Here is a man who stood up."
Anyway, that's just my uneducated two-cents. I could be right or I could
be wrong. Either way, I still highly recommend TAXI DRIVER and think that
it's a landmark in American Cinema. If you need me I'll be in my room
eating a cereal bowl full of white bread pieces with sugar, milk and peach
brandy poured on top.
Saturday, May 28, 2016
Friday, May 27, 2016
AN IDEAL HUSBAND (1999)
London 1895. Based on Oscar Wilde's play "An Ideal Husband", this 1999
adaptation is a charming comedy of manners about a member of the British
parliament, Robert Chiltern (Jeremy Northam), whose perfect life is threatened
by a Ms. Cheveley (Julianne Moore) when she informs him that she has a certain
piece of physical evidence (a letter) proving that he came into his early
fortune by selling a cabinet secret to her former lover. She plans on
going public with the letter unless...he alters his stance on a
fraudulent scheme to build a canal in Argentina. She's invested in the
scheme and will make a ton of dough if the British government supports it.
Chiltern's wife (Cate Blanchett) has no idea about her husband's past illegal
activity and believes that he is "an ideal husband".
Typing it out like that, it kinda seems like a serious story and I guess it is when you think about how Chiltern's entire career and vast fortune is based on an illegal act that should have landed him in prison, but...that's overthinking the story. And besides, as Chiltern says "Is it fair, Arthur, that some act of youthful folly should be brought up against me now all of these years later?" I mean, c'mon! All he did was make a ton of money by selling government secrets! Jeez. Who doesn't have "youthful folly" like that in their past?
Anyway, I'm looking way too deep into the story because the reason to watch the film is not seeing Chiltern's cows coming home to roost, but to see Rupert Everett's show-stealing performance as Chiltern's best friend and eternal bachelor Lord Arthur Goring! Compared to Goring's witty manner and playful dialogue, the Chiltern storyline is a bore. There's a reason that Everett's handsome mug is on all of the posters. It's because he's far and away the best part of the movie. I've seen AN IDEAL HUSBAND many times over the years (including three times in the theater) and it's always Everett's fantastic performance that brings me back.
Beautiful London locations (both inside and outside), delightful dialogue that is a joy to listen to, great performances by a strong cast, quick pace and a surprise appearance by Doug "Pinhead" Bradley. Despite the negative feelings I have towards Chiltern's "youthful folly" I still like this movie and watch it once or twice a year. Recommended.
Typing it out like that, it kinda seems like a serious story and I guess it is when you think about how Chiltern's entire career and vast fortune is based on an illegal act that should have landed him in prison, but...that's overthinking the story. And besides, as Chiltern says "Is it fair, Arthur, that some act of youthful folly should be brought up against me now all of these years later?" I mean, c'mon! All he did was make a ton of money by selling government secrets! Jeez. Who doesn't have "youthful folly" like that in their past?
Anyway, I'm looking way too deep into the story because the reason to watch the film is not seeing Chiltern's cows coming home to roost, but to see Rupert Everett's show-stealing performance as Chiltern's best friend and eternal bachelor Lord Arthur Goring! Compared to Goring's witty manner and playful dialogue, the Chiltern storyline is a bore. There's a reason that Everett's handsome mug is on all of the posters. It's because he's far and away the best part of the movie. I've seen AN IDEAL HUSBAND many times over the years (including three times in the theater) and it's always Everett's fantastic performance that brings me back.
Beautiful London locations (both inside and outside), delightful dialogue that is a joy to listen to, great performances by a strong cast, quick pace and a surprise appearance by Doug "Pinhead" Bradley. Despite the negative feelings I have towards Chiltern's "youthful folly" I still like this movie and watch it once or twice a year. Recommended.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)